Lundstrom

Lundstrom v. Young

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20233:18-cv-02856California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN LUNDSTROM, Case No. 3:18-cv-02856-GPC-MSB Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING

APPLICATION FOR ORDER

v. AUTHORIZING REGISTERED

PROCESS SERVER TO LEVY

CARLA YOUNG, et al., EXECUTION PURSUANT TO

CAL. CODE CIV. PROC. §

Defendant. 699.080 [ECF No. 171]

17 On January 30, 2023, this Court granted Defendant Young (“Young”) 18 $67,617.10 in attorneys’ fees and $1,246.58 in costs, (ECF No. 143), and on March 19 21, 2023, the Court granted Young’s motion for entry of final judgment as to the 20 claims Plaintiff Lundstrom (“Lundstrom”) asserted against Young, (ECF No. 154). 21 Young now moves for an ordering authorizing a registered process server, rather than 22 the U.S. Marshal, to levy a writ of execution pursuant to California Code of Civil 23 Procedure § 669.080. 24 The execution of final judgments is governed by Federal Rule of Civil 25 Procedure (“Rule”) 69(a). Rule 69(a) states…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.