Iceberg Associates LLP v. Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20233:22-cv-01084California6,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ICEBERG ASSOCIATES LLP, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01084-RBM-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

DYNAMIC DATA TECHNOLOGIES,

DYNAMIC DATA TECHNOLOGIES,

LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS

LLC AND MAXLINEAR, INC.,

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST Defendants. DYNAMIC DATA TECHNOLOGIES,

LLC

18 [Doc. 14] 19 On July 25, 2022, Plaintiff Iceberg Associates LLP (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action (“Complaint”) against Defendants Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (“Dynamic Data”) and MaxLinear, Inc. (“MaxLinear”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). (Doc. 1.) On September 23, 2022, Dynamic Data filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims against Dynamic Data pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff filed a response in opposition on October 10, 2022 (Doc. 22), and Dynamic Data filed a reply on November 14, 2022 (Doc. 29). For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.