Garibay

Garibay v. Attorney General

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20233:23-cv-00643California2,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARDO N.G., Case No.: 23-CV-643 JLS (NLS)

Petitioner,

ORDER INFORMING PETITIONER

v. OF OPTIONS CONCERNING

RECHARACTERIZATION OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 AS Respondent. MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(ECF No. 1)

Presently before the Court is Petitioner Bernardo N.G.’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1) and Respondent the United States of America’s2 Response in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Resp.,” ECF No. 4). Petitioner has not filed a Traverse, despite being afforded the opportunity to do so. See ECF No. 2 at 3. Having considered the Parties’ arguments and the law, the 24 25 1 In this action concerning a putative Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.