Verbick

Verbick v. The Movement Technology Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20233:20-cv-00611California7,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD E. VERBICK, an individual, Case No.: 20-CV-611 TWR (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

THE MOVEMENT TECHNOLOGY

COMPANY, INC., a Washington (ECF No. 91) corporation; PREDICTUV TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; PREDICTUV LLC, a 17 Delaware limited liability company; KELVIN HILL, an individual; ZSOLT CSENDE, an individual; VIVIEN 19 SZAKACS, an individual; CHRISTOPHER KEIL, an individual; NIALL LAWLOR, an individual; 21 GERRY LAWLOR, an individual; ROB GRINNELL, an individual; BRANDON MCCOY, an individual; and DOES 1 to 23 100, inclusive, 24 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendants The Movement Technology Company, Inc. (“TMC”), Kelvin Hill, and Zsolt Csende’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (ECF No. 91, “Mot.”), along with Plaintiff Todd E.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.