The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Superior Air, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20233:22-cv-00535California7,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE Case No. 22-cv-535-MMA (KSC)

COMPANY,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OR, IN THE

SUPERIOR AIR, INC., et al., ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR Defendants. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 25] 18 This is an indemnity action brought by Plaintiff The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“Plaintiff” or “Ohio Casualty”) against Defendants Superior Air, Inc. (“SAI”), Vinod Jothilingam, and Vandana Ahuja (collectively, “Defendants”). Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. Doc. No. 25. Plaintiff seeks indemnity and collateral security for losses and expenses it incurred, and may incur in the future, in investigating and resolving claims under construction-related surety…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.