Glasoe

Glasoe v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20233:23-cv-01035California714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADELINE M. GLASOE, Case No.: 23-CV-1035-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

18 Madeline M. Glasoe (“Plaintiff”) files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under U.S.C. section 1915(e), as required when a litigant files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s submission, the Court GRANTS the IFP motion and explains below. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. section 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.