Loyal Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Taskoob, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20233:23-cv-00382California5,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOYAL HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., Case No.: 23-CV-00382-RSH-NLS

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER DENYING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

TASKOOB, INC., et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 6] 16 17 On December 8, 2022, Plaintiff Loyal Health & Fitness, Inc. brought this civil action against Defendants Taskoob, Inc. (“Taskoob”), Ramin Geramianfar, Mehrad Mehrain, and individual Does 1–50 in San Diego Superior Court. ECF No. 1-2. Defendants removed the case to federal court on February 28, 2023. ECF No. 1. On March 21, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process (the “Motion”). ECF No. 6. The Motion has been fully briefed (ECF Nos. 8–9), and the Court finds the matter suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1. As set forth below, the Motion is denied. I. Background The Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.