L.W.

L.W. v. Snap Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20233:22-cv-00619California7,839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 L.W., minor child through her legal Case No.: 22cv619-LAB-MDD 11 guardian Jane Doe, on behalf of herself and all others similarly ORDER: situated; et al., 13 (1) GRANTING MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS FIRST AMENDED v. COMPLAINT [Dkt. 51, 53, 54];

SNAP INC.; et al. (2) DENYING AS MOOT Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE 17 ALLEGATIONS [Dkt. 52]; 18 (3) GRANTING MOTION TO 19 SEAL [Dkt. 64]; AND 20 (4) DENYING MOTION FOR 21 RULE 11 SANCTIONS [Dkt. 67] 22 Minor Plaintiffs L.W., C.A., and C.O. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this suit against Defendants Snap Inc. (“Snap”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”), and Google LLC (“Google”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for claims stemming from allegations that Snap’s Snapchat application, available for download through the Apple Store and Google Play, is an inherently dangerous software product that Defendants deceptively advertise and promote in a way that facilitates sex crimes against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.