Heizelman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBET HEIZELMAN, Case No.: 22-cv-1676-GPC-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

v. ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE

A CLAIM AND FOR FAILING TO

CHASE BANK,

PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

Defendant. WITH COURT ORDER REQUIRING

AMENDMENT

17 On February 9, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 18 pauperis and sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). ECF No. 4. The Court directed Plaintiff to file 20 an amended complaint on or before March 17, 2023. Id. Four months have passed since 21 dismissal and nearly three months have passed since Plaintiff’s amended complaint was 22 due. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint nor sought an extension of 23 time to file one. See Edwards v. Marin Park, 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The 24 failure of the plaintiff eventually to respond to the court’s ultimatum—either by 25 amending…