Luciano

Luciano v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20233:22-cv-00734California2,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TRAVIS LUCIANO, Case No. 22-cv-734-MMA (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

STRIKE; AND

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

[Doc. No. 20]

REHABILITATION,

17 Defendant. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIM FOR

PUNITIVE DAMAGES

[Doc. No. 21] 21 22 On January 30, 2023, Plaintiff Travis Luciano filed a Third Amended Complaint against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“Defendant” or “CDCR”). See Doc. No. 19 (“TAC”). Defendant now moves to strike certain allegations in Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint and dismiss Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. See Doc. Nos. 20, 21. Both motions are fully briefed, see Doc. Nos. 23–25, and the Court took the matters under submission and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.