Rashidiasl

Rashidiasl v. MEP (ESIS/ Arch/ Chubb)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20233:23-cv-00325California2,824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FARIBA RASHIDIASL, Case No.: 23-CV-0325-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; SUA SPONTE

MEP (ESIS/ARCH/CHUBB); IQARUS

DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

(international SOS), FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; Defendants. AND DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL AS MOOT

16 [Dkt. Nos. 2, 3]

18 On February 17, 2023, Plaintiff Fariba Rashidiasl (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, 19 filed a complaint against Defendants MEP (ESIS/ARCH/CHUBB) and Iqarus 20 (International SOS). (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to 21 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and a motion to 22 appoint counsel. (Dkt. Nos. 2-3.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS 23 Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, sua sponte DISMISSES the action for failure to state a 24 claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to 25 appoint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.