Tijerina

Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20233:22-cv-00203California4,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEATRIZ TIJERINA, individually, Case No.: 22-CV-203 JLS (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STRIKE THE

DECLARATIONS OF MARIA

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,

VENEGAS AND JENNIFER SANTOS

an Alaska Corporation; and DOES 1–50, INACIO PURSUANT TO FEDERAL Defendants. RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 37

(ECF No. 42)

Presently before the Court is Defendant Alaska Airlines, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Alaska”) Motion to Strike the Declarations of Maria Venegas and Jennifer Santos Inacio Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 (“MTS,” ECF No. 42). Also before the Court are Plaintiff Beatriz Tijerina’s Opposition thereto (“MTS Opp’n,” ECF No. 45) and Defendant’s Reply in support thereof (“MTS Reply,” ECF No. 47). The Court heard oral argument on May 25, 2023. See ECF No. 52. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, both in their briefs and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.