Garcia

Garcia v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20233:22-cv-01474California3,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARCIA, et al, Case No.: 22-cv-1474-GPC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al,

Defendants. [ECF No. 26] 16 On April 14, 2023, Plaintiffs Araceli Garcia and Mario Garcia (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. ECF No. 26. Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant” or “Ford”) filed an Opposition, (ECF No. 29), and Plaintiffs filed a Reply, (ECF No. 30). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs’ request and awards Plaintiffs $44,909.80 in attorneys’ fees and $1,350.75 in costs.1 22 23 1 The Court notes at the outset that the issue of subject matter jurisdiction was never determined because the Motion for Remand was denied as moot after the Parties settled. This is an unusual procedural posture, because if the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the Court recognizes it could not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.