Dunsmore
Dunsmore v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, et al., on behalf Case No.: 20-cv-00406-AJB-DDL of themselves and all others similarly 12 situated, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
14 v. PRESENT A CLAIM
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al., [Dkt. No. 280] Defendants. 18 Before the Court is nonparty Pedro Rodriguez’s (“Rodriguez”) “Federal Rule of Civ[il] Procedure 23(d) Request to Present [a] Claim” (the “Request”). Dkt. No. 280. The Court construes Rodriguez’s Request as a renewed motion to intervene, and, for the reasons stated below, RECOMMENDS that the Request be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. The Class Plaintiffs’ Claims and Relevant Procedural History The District Court and the parties are familiar with the facts and legal claims at issue in this case. Briefly stated, through this…