Bennett

Mitchell v. Bennett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20233:22-cv-01011California1,966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL, Case No.: 22-cv-1011-BAS-BGS

CDCR # BC0837,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING FOURTH

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) PAUL BENNETT, Supervising Parole AND § 1915A(b)(1) [ECF No. 25]; 16 Officer; JANE DOE, Chula Vista Parole Officer; CLAUDIA PLASCENCIA, (2) DENYING MOTION FOR District Attorney; BONNIE DUMANIS, EVIDENTIARY HEARING, 18 District Attorney; PATRICIA TAITANO APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, VALDOVINOS, San Diego Public AND STAY [ECF No. 21]; and Defender; ANGEL NUNEZ, Probation 20 Officer; BETHANY HOGGE, Probation (3) DENYING REQUEST FOR Officer, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF No. 24] 22 Defendants. 23 On July 12, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Before the Court could screen that Complaint, he filed a First Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.