Alonso

Alonso v. Quan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20233:23-cv-00760California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00760-WQH-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. WILLIAM QUAN, POLI

FLORES, ROSS, M. LEPE

12 NEGRETE, and CHRISTOPHER PLOURD, Defendants. 15 HAYES, Judge: On April 26, 2023, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights Complaint against Defendants, five judges who allegedly presided over a criminal case brought against Plaintiff in California Superior Court. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 3.) On May 18, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Proceed IFP and screening the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2). (ECF No. 4.) The Court construed the Complaint as bringing claims against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissed the claims as barred by judicial immunity and because the Complaint did not identify any specific constitutional provision violated by Defendants. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.