Trejo

Trejo v. County of Imperial

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20233:20-cv-01465California5,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TREJO, individually and as Case No.: 20-cv-1465-LAB-DDL successor in interest to JOSE 12 BANDA PICHARDO, et al., ORDER: 13 Plaintiffs, 1) GRANTING IN PART AND 14 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, et al.,

AMENDED COMPLAINT,

16 Defendants. [Dkt. 112]; and 17 2) DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE PORTIONS OF

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, [Dkt. 110]

Plaintiffs Jose Trejo and Susan Banda (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action individually and as successors in interest to their deceased son, Jose Banda Pichardo. In their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), they bring claims against Defendants County of Imperial (the “County”), Sheriff Raymond Loera, and California Forensic Medical Group (“CFMG”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that, as a result of Defendants’ negligence and deliberate indifference to Pichardo’s mental health needs, Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.