Lea

Lea v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20233:22-cv-01581California2,535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLINA LEA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01581-RBM-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [Doc. 17] Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants City of San Diego, Ace Ybanez, Joshua Clabough, Jason Gonzalez, Joshua Leiber, David Burns, Kevin Cummins, and Miles Mcardle (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 17-1 (“Mot.”).) Plaintiff Kimberlina Lea, appearing pro se, filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 19 (“Opp.”), and Defendants filed a reply (Doc. 20). The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is granted, and Plaintiff is granted leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.