Kersting

Kersting v. UnitedHealth Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20233:23-cv-00159California6,723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA KERSTING, an individual, Case No.: 23-CV-159 TWR (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION,

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, a Delaware (2) ORDERING PARTIES TO corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, ARBITRATION, AND inclusive, (3) DISMISSING WITHOUT 16 Defendants. PREJUDICE THIS ACTION 17 (ECF No. 8)

Presently before the Court is Defendant UnitedHealth Group’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay the Matter (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8), as well as Plaintiff Teresa Kersting’s Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 10) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 13) the Motion. The Court held a hearing on June 15, 2023. (See ECF No. 15.) Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, Plaintiff’s Unlimited Civil Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1 at 11–381), the record, and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.