Tamraz

Tamraz v. Bakotic Pathology Associates, L.L.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20233:22-cv-00725California348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON TAMRAZ, on behalf of Case No. 22-cv-0725-BAS-WVG himself and all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, [ECF No. 30] v.

BAKOTIC PATHOLOGY

ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. 17

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss the above-captioned action. (Joint Mot., ECF No. 30) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment, or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a compliant notice or stipulation, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.