Sami

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMER SAMI; BAN SAMI, Case No. 23-cv-0224-BAS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH

PREJUDICE

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,

Defendant. (ECF No. 16)

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which follows the parties’ entry into a settlement agreement. (Joint Mot., ECF No. 16.) The parties additionally request the Court “to retain jurisdiction . . . in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement should a dispute arise therefrom.” (Id. ¶ 3.) The portion of the parties’ Joint Motion that seeks dismissal is unproblematic. The parties have met the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which require “a stipulation of dismissal by all parties who have appeared.” Thus, the Joint Motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal with…