Hi, Inc. v. Zeetogroup, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20233:22-cv-01440California4,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HI Q, INC. d/b/a HEALTH IQ, Case No.: 22-cv-1440-LL-DDL

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL;

ZEETOGROUP, LLC, (2) DENYING MOTION FOR Respondent. PROTECTIVE ORDER; 17 and 18 (3) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED [Dkt. Nos. 15, 19] 22 Before the Court are a motion to compel by Toby Hoy (“Hoy”) and Constance Kennedy (with Hoy, the “TCPA Plaintiffs”) and a motion for a protective order by Carley Miller (“Miller”). Dkt. Nos. 15, 19 (collectively, the “Motions”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel and DENIES Miller’s motion for a protective order. Miller is ORDERED to appear for deposition within 14 days of the date of this Order. I. BACKGROUND TCPA Plaintiffs represent a putative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.