Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20233:22-cv-00676California1,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; and Case No.: 22-cv-00676-H-MSB

WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ORDER:

13 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTIONS 14 v. FOR DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES;

SHORELINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.,

Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 275, 276.] 17 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO COMPEL; AND

19 (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STRIKE

SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT

REPORTS

On June 20, 2023 and June 21, 2023, the parties filed two joint motions for determination of discovery disputes. (Doc. Nos. 275, 276.) The Court addresses these two discovery disputes in turn below. In the first discovery dispute, Plaintiffs Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (“Fate”) and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (“Whitehead”) request that the Court compel Defendant Shoreline Biosciences, Inc. to provide responses to Fate’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.