Beriones

Beriones v. IMH Asset Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20233:22-cv-01916California2,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BABETTE T. BERIONES, Case No.: 22-cv-1916-GPC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

AND DISMISSING CASE FOR

IMH ASSET CORP., et al,

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

Defendants. JURISDICTION

16 [ECF No. 70] 17 On December 5, 2022, Plaintiff Babette Beriones (“Plaintiff” or “Beriones”) filed a Complaint against several Defendants: IMH Asset Corp. (“IMH”); Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”); Wilmington Trust Company; Impac Funding Corporation (“Impac”); Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”); Bank of America; James Lowell Anthony, LLC (“JLA”); Anthony Peter Vasilas; Jessie Menzel; MTC Financial Inc. (“MTC”); Commissioner Kelly Dowlan; Commissioner Donald Armento; Judge Timothy Casserly; CA Supreme Court Patricia Guerro; CA Supreme Court Tani Cantil-Sakauye; Appellate Ct. Assoc. Charles Gill; and Does 1 thru 100 (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.