Matzner
Matzner v. Citibank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES MATZNER, Case No.: 23-CV-1015 TWR (KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING
v. ACTION TO THE SUPERIOR
COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY
CITIBANK, N.A., and DOES 1 to
OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL
INCLUSIVE,
DIVISION Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 1) 17 On June 5, 2023, the Court ordered Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (See ECF No. 4, “OSC.”) Citibank timely responded on June 14, 2023. (See ECF No. 7, “Resp.”) After carefully considering Citibank’s Response, Plaintiff Andres Matzner’s Complaint (ECF No. 1 at 6–15, “Compl.”), and the relevant law, the Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Central Division. BACKGROUND …