Rademaker

Rademaker v. Ganzekaufer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20233:21-cv-01757California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID RADEMAKER, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01757-AGS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Katchua GANZEKAUFER, et al.,

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL,

Defendants. and

16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

19 [ECF No. 29] 20 21 22 23 24 25 Before the Court is Plaintiff David Rademaker’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Appointment of Counsel and for Extension of Time. ECF No. 29. The Court will address each request in turn. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks to file a civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 relating to incidents that occurred while incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility. ECF Nos. 14, 20, 25. On April 17, 2023, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, permitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.