Brickman Investments Inc. v. Progenity, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20233:20-cv-01795California11,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-01683-RBM-AHG

IN RE PROGENITY, INC. SECURITIES

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Doc. 67] 16 On March 20, 2023, Defendants Progenity, Inc., Harry Stylli, Eric d’Esparbes, Jeffrey Alter, John Bigalke, Jeffrey Ferrell, Brian L. Kotzin, Samuel Nussbaum, Lynne Powell, Piper Sandler & Co., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and BTIG, LLC (“Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (Doc. 67.) On May 4, 2023, Plaintiffs Lin Shen, Lingjun Lin and Fusheng Lin (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to the Motion. (Doc. 68.) Defendants filed a reply on June 5, 2023. (Doc. 69.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.1 25

27 The Court notes that it incorporates by reference various findings …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.