Cantu

Cantu v. Tapestry, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20233:22-cv-01974California6,633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE CANTU, Case No. 22-cv-1974-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

TAPESTRY, INC.,

Defendant. (ECF No. 10)

16

Plaintiff Jesse Cantu (“Plaintiff”) is a self-described consumer and data privacy advocate who commenced this class-action suit on December 13, 2022, against Defendant Tapestry Inc. (“Defendant”), which does business as Coach.com (“Coach”). Plaintiff claims that Defendant’s actions—disclosing, without consent, the identities of customers and the titles of videos they view on Coach’s website to Facebook—violate the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Mot., ECF No. 10.) Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.