Palasi

Palasi v. Transunion, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20233:22-cv-01888California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREA PALASI, Case No.: 22-CV-1888-AJB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION

v. TO EXTEND DISCOVERY

DEADLINES

TRANSUNION, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 On July 7, 2023, the Parties submitted a Joint Stipulation and Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines seeking a ninety-day extension of the Court’s Scheduling Order. (“Joint Motion”, Doc. No. 24.) On July 10, 2023, the Court convened a Joint Telephonic Status Conference to discuss the Joint Motion. (Doc. No. 27.) Brett F. Bodie appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Andrea Palasi. Robin G. Sagstetter appeared on behalf of Defendant IQ Data International, Inc. Having conferred with counsel and reviewed the Joint Motion, the Joint Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Rule 16(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 16(b)(4)”) governs when a Court may modify a scheduling order. In determining whether to modify …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.