Homefed Village III Master, LLC v. Otay Landfill, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20233:20-cv-00784California7,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0784-L-JLB

LLC; )

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT vs. ) RECYCLING INTERNATIONAL INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY )

JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 94]

OTAY LANDFILL, INC et al; ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ) ) 19 ) 20 Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Recycling International Inc., dba LKQ (“LKQ”). [ECF No. 94]. Plaintiff HomeFed filed a Response in Opposition, and LKQ filed a Reply. The matter is submitted on the briefs without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant LKQ’s Motion is denied. // // // I. FACTUAL BACKGROUD HomeFed, a property developer, brought suit against its surrounding businesses, including LKQ, for contamination it encountered during development of its Otay Ranch…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.