Collings

Collings v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20233:23-cv-01076California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY COLLINGS, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01076-JES (AHG) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 [ECF No. 2] Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Upon review, the Court finds the application insufficient to determine whether Plaintiff has properly shown an inability to pay the $402 civil filing fee required by this Court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a), and will accordingly deny the motion without prejudice to refiling. A plaintiff in this Court seeking to proceed IFP must provide the Court with a signed affidavit “that includes a statement of all assets[,] which shows inability to pay initial fees or give security.” CivLR 3.2(a). Among other requirements, the affidavit must contain “[a] statement as to current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.