Lovci

Lovci v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20233:23-cv-01109California1,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAWN LOVCI, Case No.: 23-cv-1109-WQH-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of

PAUPERIS

Social Security, 11 Defendant. [ECF 2]

13 14 Plaintiff has filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF 1.) She has not paid the civil filing fee required to commence this action, and by this motion, she moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (ECF 2.) This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge William Q. Hayes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c). For the following reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the motion be DENIED without prejudice. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.