McCoy

McCoy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20233:22-cv-02075California7,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA MCCOY, Case No.: 22-CV-2075 JLS (SBC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT STEPHEN

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; LI

DEPUY PRODUCTS, INC.;

DEPUY SYNTHES, INC.;

(ECF No. 44) JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

INTERNATIONAL, Defendants.

Presently before the Court are Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; DePuy Products, Inc.; DePuy Synthes, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson International’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Experts Dana Medlin and Stephen Li (“Mot.,” ECF No. 44),1 Plaintiff 25 1 This individual case was remanded to the Southern District of California from the multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation (MDL No. 27 2244),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.