Maharaj

Maharaj v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20233:20-cv-00064California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVANAN MAHARAJ, Case No. 20-cv-00064-BAS-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO CONFIRM

ARBITRATION AWARD AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

TO LIFT STAY

Defendant. (ECF No. 70)

17 On October 27, 2021, the Court compelled to arbitration Plaintiff Devanan 18 Maharaj’s individual wage-and-hour claims pursuant to the Mutual Arbitration 19 Agreement (“MAA”) he had executed with Defendant Charter Communications, Inc., 20 dismissed the wage-and-hour claims brought on a classwide basis, and stayed Maharaj’s 21 Private Attorney General Act claim. (Arbitration Order at 21, ECF No. 67.) Arbitration 22 between Maharaj and Charter Communications ensued beginning in October 2022. (Joint 23 Mot. at 2, ECF No. 70.) Shortly thereafter, Maharaj moved for the agreed-upon arbitrator 24 to set aside the MAA as procedurally and substantively unconscionable. (Joint Mot. at 25 2.) The arbitrator granted that motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.