Arellano
Arellano v. Calderon
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20233:22-cv-00441California2,616 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 22cv441-TWR(LR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ A. CALDERON, et al.,
MOTION TO STAY EXPERT
Defendants. DISCOVERY AND VACATE THE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
16 CONFERENCE [ECF No. 34]; 17 (2) RESETTING THE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE; AND
20 (3) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO EXCUSE
THEIR APPEARANCE AT THE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE [ECF No. 39]
25 Presently before the Court are Defendants A. Calderon and A. Moreno’s renewed 26 motion for the Court to “stay expert discovery and vacate the July 19, 2023 Mandatory 27 Settlement Conference” (“Stay and Vacate Motion”) (ECF No. 34) and Defendants’ ex 28 parte application for the Court “to excuse their appearance at the Mandatory Settlement Conference” (“Excusal Application”). (ECF No. 39.) For the reasons set…