Hernandez
Hernandez v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINO HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 21-cv-944-WQH-DDL
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v. FOR ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
DR. NATHAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants. [Dkt. No. 61]
17 Plaintiff Lino Hernandez (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se in this action, alleges Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See generally Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff brings this action against Dr. Nathan Williams (“Williams”), Dr. Nasir (“Nasir”), Dr. Stepke (“Stepke”) and Dr. Erica Estock (“Estock”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). See generally id. He also requests the Court exercise supplemental jurisdiction over unspecified “state law tort claims.” See id. at 1. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment…