Hernandez

Hernandez v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20233:21-cv-00944California5,725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINO HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 21-cv-944-WQH-DDL

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. FOR ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

DR. NATHAN WILLIAMS, et al.,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. [Dkt. No. 61]

17 Plaintiff Lino Hernandez (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se in this action, alleges Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See generally Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff brings this action against Dr. Nathan Williams (“Williams”), Dr. Nasir (“Nasir”), Dr. Stepke (“Stepke”) and Dr. Erica Estock (“Estock”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). See generally id. He also requests the Court exercise supplemental jurisdiction over unspecified “state law tort claims.” See id. at 1. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.