Wilson

Wilson v. Edmonson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20233:23-cv-00605California1,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Teddy LeRoy WILSON, Jr., Case No. 23-cv-0605-AGS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF 2), DENYING MOTIONS TO

AMEND AS MOOT (ECF 4 & 5),

Amanda EDMONSON, et al., AND DISMISSING THE Defendants. COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY 9 10 Teddy LeRoy Wilson, Jr., an inmate suing defendants for civil-rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moves to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons below, that motion is denied, his motions for leave to amend are denied as moot, and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. DISCUSSION Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $402.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But if granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff need not pay those fees. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Prisoners like Wilson, however, “face an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.