Heizelman

Heizelman v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20233:23-cv-01185California2,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HEIZELMAN, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01185-JES-AHG Booking #23703816, 12 Former BOP #20068-298, ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY Plaintiff,

FILING FEES REQUIRED

14 vs. BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND AS FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT BIDEN, President; FBI; CIA; NSA; TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) SHERIFF of SAN DIEGO COUNTY;

JOHN DOES,

17 Defendants. 18 19 While he was detained at the San Diego County Sheriff Department’s Vista Detention Facility on June 20, 2023, Plaintiff Robert Heizelman filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Doc. No. 1, “Compl.”) Heizelman’s pleading is confusing and disjointed, but it appears he seeks to file a class action against the President of the United States, various federal agencies, the County Sheriff, and other unidentified San Diego Police Department officers and Sheriff’s Department deputies, for tapping and/or blocking his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.