Shaw

Shaw v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20233:20-cv-01875California2,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN REGINALD SHAW, Case No.: 20-CV-1875-GPC-DEB

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT

STU SHERMAN, Warden, et al, [Dkt. No. 20] Respondents. 16 Petitioner Shaun Reginald Shaw (“Petitioner”) filed a motion to vacate judgment on February 16, 2023. (Dkt. No. 20.) On April 18, 2023, Respondent filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 26.) On June 5, 2023, Petitioner filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 31.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion to vacate judgment. Procedural Background In 2017, Petitioner was convicted by a jury and sentenced to twenty-one years in custody. (Dkt. No. 8-1.) Petitioner timely appealed his conviction, and ultimately was resentenced to eighteen years in prison in 2019. (Dkt. No. 8-17 at 11). On December 16,

26 1 Page numbers are based on the CM/ECF pagination. 27 2019, Petitioner filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.