OSRX, Inc. v. Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20233:23-cv-01131California2,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., Case No.: 23-cv-1131-BAS-DDL

Petitioners,

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO

v. COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH

SUBPOENAS

HYMAN PHELPS & MACNAMARA,

P.C.; and KARLA L. PALMER, [Dkt. No. 1] Respondents.

I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc.’s (“Petitioners”) Petition to Compel Compliance with Subpoena (“Petition”) [Dkt. No. 1]. Petitioners seek an order compelling compliance with subpoenas for a deposition and production of documents issued to non-parties Karla Palmer, Esq. (“Palmer”) and her employer, Hyman Phelps & McNamara, P.C. (“HPM”). Palmer and HPM are regulatory counsel to ImprimisRx, LLC (“ImprimisRx”), the plaintiff in ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc. et al., 21-cv-1305-BAS- DDL (“Underlying Action”). Petitioners are the defendants in the Underlying Action. The Petition was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.