Titi

Titi v. City of San Diego Municipality

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20233:22-cv-01561California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 22-cv-01561-DMS

KATHRYN M. TITI,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE

DISMISSAL

CITY OF SAN DIEGO MUNICIPALITY,

Defendant. 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to set aside dismissal (“Pl.’s Mot.”). (ECF No. 14.) On May 11, 2023, the Court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this claim and ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this claim should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) On May 31, 2023, the Court dismissed the Action sua sponte without prejudice so that Plaintiff may bring her claim in a court of competent jurisdiction. (ECF No. 13.) In the present motion, Plaintiff seeks relief from the Court’s Order dated May 31, 2023, and asserts that the Court has federal question jurisdiction to hear her claims because Plaintiff’s claims arise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.