MSK Covertech, Inc. v. Fevisa Industrial, S.A. de C.V.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20233:23-cv-00741California1,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MSK COVERTECH, INC., Case No.: 23cv741-DMS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 22] FEVISA INDUSTRIAL, S.A. de C.V., Defendant. 16 17 On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff MSK Covertech, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “MSK”) filed a Motion for Expedited Discovery. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff seeks “narrowly tailored discovery from third parties” as to Defendant Fevisa Industrial, S.A. de C.V.’s (“Defendant” or “Fevisa”) written agreements and bank accounts. (Id. at 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff seeks leave to serve third-party subpoenas on the following four entities: (1) Specialty Minerals Inc. (“Specialty Minerals”); (2) Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (“Anheuser-Busch”); (3) Encore Glass; and (4) Home Brew Mart Inc., d/b/a Ballast Point

26 1 Plaintiff filed a “Reply in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery” on July 14, 2023, which the appeared in this case, no opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.