Sywula
Sywula v. DaCosta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF SYWULA, Case No. 21-cv-01450-BAS-SBC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO TELEPORT MOBILITY, INC., et al., COMPEL ARBITRATION; and Defendants. (2) STAYING ACTION
17 (ECF No. 80)
Pending before the Court is Defendant Teleport Mobility, Inc. (“Teleport”)’s motion to compel arbitration of this patent-inventorship action (“Inventorship Action”). (Mot., ECF No. 80.) It is joined by its co-Defendants, Alexis DaCosta (“DaCosta”) and Vincent Coletti (“Coletti”). (Not. of Joinder, ECF No. 81.) Plaintiff Krzysztof Sywula (“Sywula”) opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 84) and Teleport replies (Reply, ECF No. 86.) The Court finds Teleport’s Motion suitable for resolution without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion and STAYS this case pending arbitration. // // I. BACKGROUND By now, this Court is well versed in the facts that gave…