Shulters

Shulters v. Social Security Add. Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:23-cv-01291California1,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL SHULTERS, Case No.: 23-CV-1291 JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; (2) DENYING REQUEST FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADD. OFFICE,

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

Defendant. AND (3) DISMISSING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES

REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

17 (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Michael Shulter’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2), and Request for Appointment of Counsel (“Req. for Counsel,” ECF No. 3). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and Request for Counsel WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to pay the filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). MOTION TO PROCEED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.