Jackson v. Covello et.al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO JACKSON, Case No.: 19-cv-02444-JAH-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S P. COVELLO, et al.,
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
Defendants. COUNSEL [ECF No. 66]; AND
16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’s MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [ECF No. 67]
19 Presently before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Jackson (“Plaintiff”). First, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting appointment of counsel to assist him in prosecuting this civil action filed pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 66.) Additionally, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants. (ECF No. 67.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 66) and GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time 27 …