Serna

Serna v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20233:22-cv-00841California1,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFRED DAVID SERNA, Case No. 22-cv-00841-JES-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

CONTINUE THE DEADLINE

MADDEN, Warden, et al., TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUDGMENT; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL 19 [DKT. NO. 45]

22 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Alfred Serna’s Motion Requesting Another Continuance of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 45. Plaintiff requests: (1) an extension of Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) appointment of counsel. Id. 28 For the reasons discussed below, the Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED IN

PART and DENIED IN PART.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.