Serna
Serna v. Madden
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20233:22-cv-00841California1,301 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFRED DAVID SERNA, Case No. 22-cv-00841-JES-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
CONTINUE THE DEADLINE
MADDEN, Warden, et al., TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Defendants. JUDGMENT; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
OF COUNSEL 19 [DKT. NO. 45]
22 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Alfred Serna’s Motion Requesting Another Continuance of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 45. Plaintiff requests: (1) an extension of Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) appointment of counsel. Id. 28 For the reasons discussed below, the Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART.