Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG MICHAEL BEVAN, an individual; 12 individually and on behalf of all others ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ similarly situated, MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT
REPORTS PREPARED BY TERESA
Plaintiffs,
FULIMENI AND PRECLUDE
v. TESTIMONY
ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON [ECF No. 161] SUNDSTRAND, d/b/a COLLINS
AEROSPACE; UNITED
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendants. 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants Rohr, Inc.; Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation; and United Technologies Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Strike Expert Reports prepared by Teresa Fulimeni and Preclude Testimony. ECF No. 161. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition, (ECF No. 161), and Defendants filed a Reply, (ECF No. 180). For the reasons below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion. 26 27 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs brought this class action to…