Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20233:21-cv-00812California5,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB

Plaintiff,

PUBLIC VERSION

v. [REDACTED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.,

NON-PARTIES KENOSHA

Defendant. INVESTMENTS LP AND

GRONOSTAJ INVESTMENTS

LLC’S MOTION TO QUASH

DEFENDANT’S SUBPOENAS

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. [ECF No. 149] 19 Before the Court is Kenosha Investments LP (“Kenosha”) and Gronostaj Investments LLC’s (“Gronostaj1”) (collectively, “the Funders”) Motion to Quash Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Subpoenas. (ECF No. 149.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Funders’ Motion to Quash and DENIES their request for Defendant to pay their costs and fees.

26 Gronostaj Investments LLC was formerly known as Roosevelt Investments Group, LLC. (ECF No. 149 at 4, n.1.) Accordingly, some prior filings and discovery refer to it as 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.