Allen

Allen v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20233:20-cv-01389California7,576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALLEN, Case No.: 20-CV-1389 JLS (LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

DIAZ, et al.,

DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT

(ECF Nos. 66, 69)

18 Presently before the Court is Defendant Theresa Currier’s (“Defendant” or “Dr. Currier”) Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 69). Plaintiff Michael Allen filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 86), and Defendant filed a Reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 93). Having considered Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC,” ECF No. 66), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s TAC. / / / / / / / / / FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.