Cooper

Cooper v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:20-cv-01342California666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SYDNEY COOPER, Case No.: 20-cv-01342-AJB-NLS Plaintiff, ORDER RESPONDING TO v. REFERRAL NOTICE

DANIEL PARAMO, et al., (Doc. No. 43) Defendants. 15 On September 14, 2020, Plaintiff Sydney Cooper, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed an amended complaint against Daniel Paramo, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and various other CDCR staff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Doc. No. 7.) On October 1, 2020, the Court (1) dismissed Plaintiff’s claims and some of Defendants for failure to state a claim and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b); and (2) directing U.S. Marshal to effect service on Defendants Romero and Godinez. (See Doc. No. 8.) On November 17, 2021, the Court issued a Notice of Hearing regarding Dismissal for Want of Persecution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.